Ballast Markets logoBallast Markets
MarketsStackWhy BallastPortsChokepointsInsightsLearn
Join the Waitlist

Port of Chittagong: Bangladesh RMG Export Gateway & Trade Signals

Port of Chittagong processed 3.276 million TEUs in 2024, up 7.42% year-over-year, cementing its role as Bangladesh's lifeline for international trade and the primary export gateway for the world's second-largest ready-made garment industry. For traders tracking South Asian supply chains and Bangladesh's $38.48 billion garment export sector, Chittagong's congestion metrics and throughput data provide critical signals for economic growth forecasts and trade flow predictions.

Why Port of Chittagong Matters

Port of Chittagong handles over 90% of Bangladesh's international trade, making it the country's most critical infrastructure asset. Located on the Karnaphuli River in southeastern Bangladesh, the port serves a nation of 170 million people and provides the sole viable ocean freight gateway for landlocked regions extending into India's northeast states and potentially Myanmar.

The port's strategic importance centers on Bangladesh's ready-made garment (RMG) industry, which exported $38.48 billion in apparel in 2024, growing 7.23% from 2023 levels. As the world's second-largest garment exporter after China, Bangladesh depends on Chittagong Port to move finished clothing to Western markets while importing raw materials—cotton from India and the United States, yarn from China and Pakistan, and fabric from China and Vietnam—that feed its 4,000+ garment factories.

In fiscal year 2024-25, Chittagong Port handled 3.296 million TEUs and 123.9 million tonnes of cargo, generating Tk 75,432 crore in customs revenue for the Bangladesh government. According to Lloyd's List Intelligence, Chittagong ranks 67th among the world's busiest container ports, processing 99% of Bangladesh's container trade while Mongla Port handles the remaining 1%.

For prediction market participants, Chittagong Port represents a measurable proxy for Bangladesh's economic health. Monthly TEU volumes correlate directly with RMG export performance, import demand for industrial inputs, and overall GDP growth. IMF PortWatch tracks vessel movements and queue metrics via satellite AIS data, providing traders with real-time signals on congestion, throughput trends, and supply chain disruptions that precede official statistics by 5-10 business days.

The port's chronic congestion issues—yard capacity regularly exceeds 88% utilization during peak export season—create tradeable volatility in throughput markets, while the $10 billion Bay Terminal expansion project (expected completion 2029-2030) represents a structural shift that will reshape Bangladesh's trade capacity and competitiveness.

Signals Traders Watch

Yard Capacity Utilization Chittagong Port's container yards operate at 70-88% capacity during normal periods, but peak RMG export season (September-December) regularly pushes utilization above 88%. In July 2024, yard capacity hit 88.3% with 35,421 TEUs occupying storage areas, forcing vessel diversions and extended dwell times. When yard utilization exceeds 85%, container dwell times typically increase from 3-4 days to 6-8 days within 7-10 days, creating predictable binary market setups around congestion threshold triggers.

Traders monitor yard capacity as a leading indicator of port efficiency breakdowns. Unlike deep-water ports with automated stacking systems, Chittagong relies on manual operations and limited yard space, making capacity constraints the primary bottleneck. IMF PortWatch doesn't publish real-time yard metrics, but vessel queue lengths and dwell time spikes (both tracked via AIS data) provide proxy signals for yard saturation 3-5 days ahead of official acknowledgment.

Vessel Waiting Time at Anchorage Under normal operations, vessels berth within 24-48 hours of arrival at Chittagong anchorage. During disruptions, waiting times extend dramatically: July 2024 political unrest caused 13 container vessels to queue for berths while berthed vessels remained at jetties for 3-5 days instead of the standard 48-hour turnaround for loading/discharge operations.

Vessel waiting time serves as Chittagong's most reliable real-time congestion metric. Traders use AIS data from IMF PortWatch to count vessels anchored outside the port and calculate average wait times. When waiting time exceeds 3 days (vs. 1-2 day baseline), congestion typically persists for 10-14 days as the backlog clears, creating profitable positioning opportunities in weekly or monthly binary markets on "Will average vessel wait time exceed 72 hours in [month]?"

RMG Export Volume from Chittagong District Factories Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) publishes monthly export data broken down by region. Chittagong district factories—concentrated in CEPZ (Chittagong Export Processing Zone), KEPZ (Korean Export Processing Zone), and Karnaphuli EPZ—exported $543 million in RMG during the first four months of FY 2024-25.

Monthly breakdown:

  • July 2024: $106 million (7.94% growth)
  • August 2024: $166 million (55.98% growth)
  • September 2024: $132 million (-20% decline due to floods)
  • October 2024: $137 million (recovery from flood disruption)

RMG export volumes forecast port congestion 15-20 days ahead: garment factories book container slots and arrange trucking 10-14 days before vessel departure; containers arrive at port 3-5 days before loading. Traders who track BGMEA district data gain early signals on export surges that will stress port infrastructure before throughput impacts appear in official port statistics.

Container Dwell Time Healthy container dwell time at Chittagong runs 3-4 days (import containers clear customs and exit gates within 72-96 hours; export containers arrive 2-3 days before vessel loading). During congestion episodes, dwell extends to 6-10 days as yard congestion slows gate operations, customs processing backlogs, and trucking delays compound.

Extended dwell time creates cascading effects: importers face demurrage charges (typically $50-75/day after free time expires), export containers miss vessel sailings and incur roll penalties, and yard capacity constraints worsen as containers occupy scarce space longer. Traders use dwell time as a leading indicator for freight cost inflation and export delays that impact Bangladesh's competitiveness against Vietnam and India in global garment supply chains.

Bay Terminal Construction Progress The Bay Terminal expansion project represents Bangladesh's largest port infrastructure investment at $10 billion total cost. Originally scheduled for partial operation by 2024, the project now targets 2026 for first terminal operations with full completion by 2029-2030.

The project will add:

  • Three container terminals (two at 1,225 meters each, one multipurpose terminal at 1,500 meters)
  • 11 jetties across 4.95 km of total berth length
  • 12-meter draft capability (vs. current 9-10 meter restriction)
  • Capacity for post-Panamax vessels and direct mainline services bypassing Singapore/Colombo transshipment

Traders monitor Bay Terminal progress via Chittagong Port Authority announcements, construction tender awards, and equipment procurement contracts. Milestone completions (first berth operational, first vessel call, capacity certification) create step-function improvements in port throughput potential, making construction timelines tradeable via long-dated binary markets on "Will Bay Terminal handle over 100,000 TEUs in [quarter]?"

Bangladesh-China Bilateral Trade Volume China serves as Bangladesh's largest trading partner with $25 billion in bilateral trade, primarily comprising Chinese fabric, yarn, and accessories imports for Bangladesh's garment factories and Bangladeshi RMG exports to Western markets (with Chinese logistics companies handling much of the shipping).

Bangladesh joined China's Belt and Road Initiative in 2017, positioning Chittagong as a node in the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. China provides 97% duty-free access to Bangladeshi goods and finances infrastructure projects including deep-sea port studies and inland connectivity. Changes in China-Bangladesh trade policy, RMB-Taka exchange rates, or BRI investment flows create measurable impacts on Chittagong container volumes within 30-60 days (fabric import order-to-shipment cycle time).

Traders track China's customs data (released monthly with 15-day lag) for Bangladesh export/import volumes to forecast Chittagong TEU flows. When Chinese fabric exports to Bangladesh surge (indicating RMG production ramp-up), Chittagong outbound container volumes typically increase 25-35 days later (production lead time plus shipping booking).

India-Bangladesh Trade Policy Changes India's April 2025 revocation of transhipment facilities and May 2025 restrictions on land border imports forced Bangladesh to reroute $563 million in RMG exports through seaports exclusively. Over 93% of Bangladesh's $563 million in RMG exports to India in FY 2024-25 previously moved via land routes through Petrapole-Benapole and other border crossings; rerouting to Kolkata and Nhava Sheva seaports increased logistics costs and transit times.

These policy shifts increase reliance on Chittagong Port for India-bound exports, potentially adding 50,000-75,000 TEUs annually to port volume (based on $563M export value at ~$15,000/TEU average RMG container value). Traders monitor India-Bangladesh diplomatic developments, particularly around water sharing (Teesta River), border security, and trade balances, to forecast policy changes affecting Chittagong's hinterland reach and competitive positioning against Kolkata and Haldia ports.

Ocean Freight Rates from Colombo and Singapore Feeder Routes Chittagong lacks deep-water berths for ultra-large container vessels (current draft limitation 9-10 meters vs. 14-16 meters for mainline ships), forcing reliance on feeder services to hub ports. Most Bangladesh-Europe and Bangladesh-North America cargo transships through Singapore, Colombo, or Port Klang before loading onto mainline vessels.

Colombo-Chittagong feeder rates fluctuate based on supply-demand imbalances. When rates spike above $250/TEU (vs. $150-200 baseline), importers and exporters face margin pressure, creating incentives to consolidate shipments or delay non-urgent cargo. These rate movements forecast Chittagong throughput changes 20-30 days later (booking-to-shipment lag) and provide early signals on regional trade flow stress.

Singapore-Chittagong rates track broader Asia-Europe and trans-Pacific capacity trends. When mainline rates surge (e.g., Suez Canal disruptions drive Asia-Europe premiums), feeder capacity tightens as carriers prioritize high-margin mainline routes, reducing feeder frequency to Chittagong and potentially causing cargo backlogs.

Historical Context

2024: Record Growth Despite Disruptions Chittagong Port set a record in 2024 with 3.276 million TEUs handled, surpassing 2023's 3.05 million TEUs by 7.42%. This growth occurred despite significant challenges: July 2024 political unrest caused operational slowdowns and vessel queue buildups, while September 2024 floods in northern Bangladesh disrupted RMG production and export flows (reflected in -20% September export decline for Chittagong factories).

The port's resilience during disruption demonstrates Bangladesh's export dependency—even during political instability, garment factories maintained operations where possible to fulfill Western buyer orders for holiday season inventory. For traders, 2024 illustrated how Bangladesh's economic necessity overrides short-term disruption risks, supporting mean-reversion positioning strategies after congestion spikes.

July 2024 Political Unrest and Congestion Crisis Political protests in July 2024 caused labor disruptions and security concerns at Chittagong Port, extending vessel turnaround times from 48 hours to 3-5 days. At least 13 container vessels queued at anchorage while yard capacity hit 88.3% with 35,421 TEUs occupying limited storage space. The congestion persisted for 10-12 days before operations normalized in early August.

This episode created a natural experiment for traders studying Chittagong's congestion dynamics: yard capacity above 85% triggers non-linear deterioration in turnaround times; vessel queues above 10 ships typically require 7-10 days to clear even after underlying disruption resolves; RMG exporters prioritize Chittagong factories during Dhaka disruptions, concentrating cargo flows and worsening local congestion.

Binary markets on "Will vessel queue exceed 10 ships in [month]?" priced at 15-20% probability before July unrest but spiked to 75-85% during the crisis, offering 4-5x returns to traders monitoring Bangladesh political stability indicators and port labor conditions.

April 2025 India Transhipment Revocation India's decision to revoke transhipment facilities for Bangladesh in April 2025, effective immediately, disrupted established trade patterns. Previously, Bangladeshi exporters used Indian land customs stations and ports (Kolkata, Haldia) to reach third-country markets via India's infrastructure. Revocation forced rerouting exclusively through Chittagong and Mongla ports for ocean freight.

The policy shift affected $563 million in annual RMG exports to India (93% previously via land routes) and additional third-country transshipment volumes. For traders, this created a structural increase in Chittagong's baseline throughput expectations and highlighted geopolitical risk as a critical factor in South Asian port market analysis. Spread trades comparing Chittagong vs. Kolkata throughput captured this policy-driven volume shift.

2017 Belt and Road Initiative Integration Bangladesh's 2017 decision to join China's Belt and Road Initiative positioned Chittagong as a strategic node in the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. Chinese investment in Bangladesh infrastructure—including feasibility studies for deep-sea port development, inland connectivity projects, and logistics facilities—aimed to reduce China-South Asia shipping costs and expand Chinese influence in the Indian Ocean region.

BRI integration increased Chinese fabric and yarn exports to Bangladesh (supporting RMG production) and provided financing for port expansions. However, Bay Terminal construction delays and debt sustainability concerns raised questions about BRI implementation effectiveness. Traders monitoring China's overseas lending portfolios and Bangladesh's external debt ratios can identify risks to port expansion timelines and operational subsidies.

Decade of Steady Growth (2014-2023) From 2014 to 2023, Chittagong Port container volume grew from approximately 2.1 million TEUs to 3.05 million TEUs, reflecting 4-5% compound annual growth driven by Bangladesh's expanding garment export sector and rising consumer imports. This steady baseline growth helps traders distinguish cyclical congestion (weather, political events, seasonal surges) from structural capacity constraints requiring long-term infrastructure investment.

The growth trajectory also demonstrates Bangladesh's economic resilience: despite periodic political instability, infrastructure bottlenecks, and natural disasters (cyclones, floods), RMG export demand from Western retailers sustained Chittagong's throughput increases. Understanding this baseline trend supports mean-reversion strategies in throughput markets and binary positioning on "Will annual growth exceed 5%?" given historical norms.

Seasonality & Risk Drivers

RMG Export Peak Season (September-December) Bangladesh's garment factories ramp production in June-July to meet Western retailer orders for Black Friday, Christmas, and holiday season inventory. Export container shipments peak in September-October (garments must arrive at U.S./European distribution centers by early November for retail stocking). Peak season volume can exceed baseline by 15-25%, straining Chittagong's yard capacity, berth availability, and chassis pools.

Traders position long congestion ahead of September buildups, with profit-taking in late November as volumes normalize. Historical data shows yard capacity exceeding 85% in 8 of the last 10 September-October periods, supporting high-probability binary bets on "Will yard utilization exceed 85% in Q4?" at premiums above 65-70%.

Monsoon Season (June-September) Bangladesh's monsoon season brings heavy rainfall that can disrupt port operations through flooding, reduced visibility, and river siltation affecting channel depths. While Chittagong operates year-round, monsoon impacts create 1-3 day delays for vessel arrivals and cargo handling during severe weather events.

September 2024 floods in northern Bangladesh demonstrated secondary effects: RMG production disruptions caused a -20% export decline from Chittagong factories that month, reducing port throughput. Traders monitor Bangladesh Meteorological Department forecasts and historical monsoon severity data to price weather-related disruption risks in Q2-Q3 throughput markets.

Lunar New Year (January-February) Chinese and Vietnamese fabric suppliers close for 1-2 weeks around Lunar New Year, creating a predictable slowdown in raw material imports to Bangladesh garment factories. Inbound container volumes drop 20-30% in late January through mid-February, while outbound RMG shipments decline as factories exhaust pre-holiday fabric inventories.

This seasonality supports short positions on throughput markets in Q1, particularly binary markets on "Will monthly TEUs exceed 275,000 in February?" when historical data shows February averaging 250,000-270,000 TEUs (vs. 280,000-300,000 in non-holiday months).

Ramadan Period (Variable Month) Ramadan's timing varies annually based on the Islamic lunar calendar. During Ramadan, labor productivity at Chittagong Port declines 10-15% as Muslim workers observe fasting hours and adjusted work schedules. Cargo handling slows, gate operations reduce evening hours, and customs processing extends turnaround times.

Traders must track Ramadan dates (shifting approximately 11 days earlier each Gregorian year) to forecast seasonal productivity impacts. When Ramadan overlaps with RMG peak export season (e.g., September-October), congestion risks compound as reduced labor efficiency meets peak cargo volumes, creating profitable volatility setups in dwell time and vessel wait time markets.

How to Trade It on Prediction Markets

Ballast Markets enables traders to express views on Port of Chittagong congestion, throughput, and Bangladesh trade flows through three primary market types:

Binary Markets

Binary markets offer YES/NO outcomes for specific thresholds:

"Will Chittagong Port monthly throughput exceed 280,000 TEUs in December 2024?" Resolution: Official Chittagong Port Authority statistics published ~10 business days after month-end. Use AIS-derived early estimates from IMF PortWatch to gain 5-7 day informational edge before official data.

"Will vessel queue length exceed 10 ships on any day in November 2024?" Resolution: Daily IMF PortWatch queue counts derived from AIS vessel positioning data. Position based on BGMEA RMG export data and Bangladesh political stability indicators 15-20 days ahead of congestion.

"Will Chittagong Port yard capacity exceed 85% in Q4 2024?" Resolution: Chittagong Port Authority operational reports (published quarterly with 15-20 day lag). Use vessel wait times and dwell time proxies as leading indicators for yard saturation.

"Will Bay Terminal handle its first commercial vessel by June 2025?" Resolution: Chittagong Port Authority official announcements and vessel call records. Monitor construction progress updates, equipment commissioning, and regulatory approvals for milestone timing signals.

Positioning tips: Binary markets work best for event-driven catalysts with clear resolution criteria. Watch for political developments (stability risks, India-Bangladesh policy changes), seasonal transitions (RMG peak season onset, monsoon severity), or infrastructure milestones (Bay Terminal berth completions). Use limit orders to avoid overpaying during sentiment-driven mispricings, especially around Bangladesh political events where volatility spikes create temporary dislocations.

Scalar Markets

Scalar markets allow trading on specific ranges or indices:

"Chittagong Port Throughput Index — Q4 2024" Range: 0–150 (baseline = 100, representing 12-month rolling average) Resolution: Indexed to official quarterly TEU volume vs. trailing average Notes: Captures both directional views (Bangladesh export growth acceleration/deceleration) and volatility exposure. Trade spreads between Q3 and Q4 to express RMG seasonality views, or Q1 vs. Q4 for Lunar New Year vs. peak export season contrasts.

"Bangladesh RMG Export Volume — December 2024" Range: $2.5B–$4.0B Resolution: BGMEA monthly export statistics (published 5-7 days after month-end) Notes: Direct proxy for Bangladesh economic health and Chittagong Port throughput. Correlates with broader Asian textile export trends; use China/Vietnam garment export data as leading indicators.

"Chittagong Port Average Vessel Wait Time — Q1 2025" Range: 1.0–7.0 days Resolution: Quarterly average of daily IMF PortWatch vessel queue metrics Notes: When wait time exceeds 3.5 days, congestion typically cascades to extended dwell times and yard capacity stress. Use this as a congestion severity gauge for positioning longer-dated throughput markets.

Positioning tips: Scalar markets provide granular exposure to throughput or congestion metrics. Use these for spread trading across time periods (November vs. December peak season timing) or comparing related entities (Chittagong vs. Colombo feeder route dynamics; Bangladesh vs. Vietnam garment export competitiveness). Size positions based on historical volatility—Chittagong throughput exhibits ~18% quarterly std dev during normal periods, rising to 30-35% during political or weather disruptions.

Index Basket Strategies

Combine Port of Chittagong with related markets to create diversified positions:

South Asia Garment Export Index Components: Chittagong Port throughput (50%), Colombo Port throughput (25%), Bangladesh RMG exports (15%), India textile exports (10%) Use case: Hedge South Asian textile supply chain risk or express views on regional competitiveness vs. China/Vietnam Construction: Create index on Ballast by defining component weights and resolution sources for each metric. Rebalance quarterly based on trade share shifts.

Bangladesh Economic Health Index Components: Chittagong Port TEUs (30%), RMG export value (30%), remittance inflows (20%), foreign reserves (20%) Use case: Comprehensive Bangladesh macro exposure for traders positioning on economic growth, currency stability, or policy shifts Construction: Normalize each component to z-scores vs. 5-year historical averages; equal-weight or customize based on leading vs. lagging indicator preferences.

China-Bangladesh Trade Flow Index Components: Chittagong Port inbound TEUs (40%), Bangladesh fabric imports from China (30%), Chinese logistics investment in Bangladesh (20%), BRI project disbursements (10%) Use case: Track Belt and Road Initiative implementation effectiveness and China's economic influence in Bangladesh Construction: Quarterly rebalancing aligned with China customs data release cycles and Bangladesh Bank external sector reports.

Positioning tips: Index baskets reduce idiosyncratic risk (e.g., single-port weather disruptions) while maintaining exposure to systemic themes (Bangladesh export competitiveness, South Asian supply chain efficiency, China-India regional competition). Use baskets for longer-duration positions (quarterly or annual markets) where diversification smooths short-term noise. Correlation analysis shows Chittagong throughput correlates 0.75-0.85 with Bangladesh RMG exports, 0.60-0.70 with Colombo feeder routes, and 0.50-0.60 with broader Asian garment export trends—structure baskets accordingly.

Related Trade Routes & Prediction Markets

Port of Chittagong operates within a broader South Asian and global trade network. Traders gain analytical edge by monitoring related ports, chokepoints, and trade corridors:

Port of Colombo serves as the primary transshipment hub for Chittagong feeder services, handling Bangladesh cargo bound for Europe, North America, and East Asia. When Colombo experiences congestion (e.g., 2022 economic crisis), feeder frequency to Chittagong declines, causing Bangladesh cargo backlogs. Spread trades comparing Chittagong vs. Colombo throughput capture transshipment dependency dynamics and South Asian port competition. Colombo's superior infrastructure and 15-meter draft capability positions it as a potential alternative if Bay Terminal construction delays persist.

Port of Singapore competes with Colombo as a transshipment hub for Bangladesh-East Asia trade flows. Singapore's efficiency and network connectivity make it the preferred route for Bangladesh exports to China, Japan, and South Korea, while also handling re-exports of Chinese and Southeast Asian goods to Bangladesh. Singapore congestion or policy changes (port dues, environmental regulations) create opportunities for Colombo market share gains, indirectly affecting Chittagong feeder service quality and frequency. Traders monitor Singapore Maritime Port Authority data for signals on regional capacity stress.

Port Klang (Malaysia) serves as a tertiary transshipment option for Bangladesh cargo, particularly for Southeast Asian trade. Port Klang's recent expansions and competitive pricing have attracted some Bangladesh cargo diversion from Colombo/Singapore routes. When Indian Ocean shipping capacity tightens (e.g., Suez Canal disruptions forcing Asia-Europe traffic around Africa), Port Klang gains market share as carriers optimize routing. Spread trades comparing Chittagong-Klang vs. Chittagong-Colombo feeder volumes capture routing preference shifts.

Jawaharlal Nehru Port (Mumbai) competes with Chittagong for northeastern India hinterland cargo. India's 2025 transhipment revocation and land border restrictions reduced Chittagong's hinterland reach into Indian territory, benefiting Mumbai and Kolkata ports. Traders tracking India-Bangladesh diplomatic relations and trade policy can position spread trades anticipating cargo shifts between Chittagong and Indian ports based on policy developments.

U.S.-China Tariff Corridor indirectly impacts Chittagong via global textile supply chain dynamics. Higher U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods increase Western retailer sourcing from Bangladesh, Vietnam, and India as tariff-avoidance strategies. When U.S.-China trade tensions escalate, Bangladesh RMG export orders surge 6-12 months later (buyer sourcing shift lag time), creating predictable Chittagong throughput increases. Traders use effective tariff rate (ETR) movements as leading indicators for Bangladesh export demand.

Suez Canal disruptions force Asia-Europe shipping around Africa via Cape of Good Hope, adding 10-14 days transit time and increasing freight costs 15-25%. Bangladesh RMG exporters shipping to European markets face margin pressure and delivery delays during Suez disruptions, potentially reducing order volumes. Traders monitor Suez Canal Authority transit counts and freight rate indices to forecast Bangladesh export competitiveness impacts, positioning binary markets on "Will Bangladesh-EU RMG exports decline over 5% in [quarter]?" during prolonged Suez closures.

Data Sources & Methodology

Traders analyzing Port of Chittagong rely on multiple data sources, each with distinct release schedules and reliability characteristics:

Chittagong Port Authority Official Statistics Release: Monthly TEU volumes published ~10 business days after month-end; quarterly operational reports (yard capacity, vessel turnaround times) with 15-20 day lag Reliability: High for throughput totals; moderate for congestion metrics (authorities may underreport during disruptions to minimize reputational damage) Access: Public via CPA website and Bangladesh media outlets; detailed operational data requires stakeholder access Trading edge: Combine AIS vessel tracking from IMF PortWatch with CPA data to identify discrepancies and early-estimate throughput 5-7 days before official release

Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) Release: Monthly RMG export data by value and destination market, published 5-7 days after month-end; quarterly reports include regional breakdowns (Dhaka vs. Chittagong factory exports) Reliability: High—BGMEA represents 4,000+ member factories and compiles data directly from export documentation Access: Public summaries via BGMEA website and Bangladesh business media; detailed member data restricted Trading edge: BGMEA data forecasts Chittagong Port outbound container volumes with 15-20 day lead time (factory export booking to vessel loading lag); use Chittagong district factory data as direct port throughput proxy

IMF PortWatch Release: Daily updates on vessel positions, queue counts, and estimated throughput for 1,802 global ports including Chittagong Reliability: High for vessel tracking (satellite AIS data from 90,000+ ships); moderate for throughput estimates (algorithmic inference may miss smaller vessels or mislabel cargo types) Access: Public dashboard at portwatch.imf.org with free 30-day delay; real-time access requires subscription Trading edge: AIS vessel queuing data provides 3-5 day leading indicator for official congestion announcements; combine with CPA turnaround time baselines to identify developing congestion before media reports

Bangladesh Bank External Sector Reports Release: Monthly trade statistics (imports/exports by value, partner country, commodity category); quarterly balance of payments with current account details Reliability: High—official central bank data compiled from customs and banking channels Access: Public via Bangladesh Bank website, typically 20-25 day lag after month-end Trading edge: Import statistics forecast inbound container volumes (divide import value by average cargo value per TEU to estimate container counts); remittance flows indicate consumer demand for imported goods

World Trade Organization (WTO) Bangladesh Trade Profile Release: Annual comprehensive trade statistics with 6-12 month lag; includes tariff rates, trade agreements, commodity composition Reliability: High—WTO aggregates official government submissions and verifies against partner country data Access: Public via WTO statistics database Trading edge: Limited for real-time trading; useful for understanding structural trade patterns, tariff sensitivity, and long-term competitiveness trends affecting multi-year Chittagong throughput projections

Lloyd's List Intelligence Release: Annual port rankings; weekly market analysis and news coverage of South Asian ports Reliability: High—industry-standard source combining official port data, carrier reports, and independent research Access: Subscription required for detailed data; rankings published publicly Trading edge: Lloyd's provides context on competitive positioning (Chittagong vs. regional ports), infrastructure project timelines, and industry sentiment useful for positioning longer-dated markets

Risk Disclosures

Trading involves risk. Prices can move quickly, and regulatory outcomes may differ from expectations. This is not investment advice.

Port congestion markets carry specific risks including political instability in Bangladesh (which can cause unpredictable operational disruptions), infrastructure project delays (Bay Terminal timeline uncertainty creates capacity forecast challenges), weather events (cyclones, floods, monsoons), geopolitical tensions (India-Bangladesh policy changes, China-India regional competition), and data quality issues (official statistics may lag or contain errors during crises).

Bangladesh's economic dependency on RMG exports creates concentration risk—shifts in Western retailer sourcing preferences, trade policy changes (GSP access, tariff rates), or labor cost advantages eroding to competitors (Vietnam, Cambodia, Ethiopia) can cause rapid throughput declines. Traders should monitor global textile trade trends and comparative cost structures when positioning Chittagong markets.

Currency volatility (Taka depreciation vs. USD/EUR) affects Bangladesh's export competitiveness and import costs, indirectly impacting port volumes. External debt sustainability concerns and foreign reserve adequacy pose macro risks to Bangladesh's trade capacity and infrastructure investment funding.

Prediction markets provide price discovery and hedging tools but do not eliminate underlying risks. Participants should conduct independent research, understand resolution criteria, and size positions appropriately for their risk tolerance.

How Ballast Markets Handles Port Data

Ballast Markets sources Port of Chittagong data from multiple verified providers to ensure accuracy and resilience:

Primary Sources:

  • Chittagong Port Authority official monthly statistics for TEU volume resolution
  • IMF PortWatch satellite AIS data for vessel queue counts and real-time congestion metrics
  • Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) for RMG export volumes
  • Bangladesh Bank external sector reports for trade value verification

Resolution Process: Monthly throughput markets resolve to official CPA statistics published within 10 business days of month-end. If CPA data is unavailable due to disruptions, Ballast uses IMF PortWatch algorithmic estimates as fallback, clearly disclosed in market terms. Vessel queue and wait time markets resolve to IMF PortWatch daily metrics, providing real-time settlement without dependence on government reporting.

Data Verification: Ballast cross-references CPA data against BGMEA export volumes, Bangladesh Bank import statistics, and carrier booking data to identify discrepancies. Material variances trigger manual review and potential market delays until resolution. Historical data shows less than 2% variance between CPA official statistics and IMF PortWatch estimates over 12-month periods, validating algorithmic reliability.

Evidence Publication: Ballast publishes settlement evidence including source URLs, data timestamps, and calculation methodologies for all resolved markets. Traders can verify settlement accuracy independently using the same public sources, ensuring transparency and dispute resolution clarity.

Start trading Port of Chittagong congestion, throughput, and Bangladesh RMG export markets at ballastmarkets.com.

Sources

  • IMF PortWatch (accessed October 2024) — https://portwatch.imf.org/
  • Chittagong Port Authority Official Statistics 2024 — https://www.cpa.gov.bd/
  • Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) FY 2024-25 Reports
  • The Business Standard Bangladesh, "Ctg port handles record 32.96 lakh containers in FY25" (2025)
  • Lloyd's List Intelligence Port Rankings 2024
  • Bangladesh Bank Quarterly Review on Readymade Garments (RMG): October-December FY'24
  • World Trade Organization Bangladesh Trade Profile 2024
  • Container News, "Port of Chittagong reports improved container performance in 2024"
  • The Daily Star Bangladesh, "Chattogram Port: From archaic anchorage to modern marvel" (2024)

Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Ballast Markets is not affiliated with PolyMarket or Kalshi. Data references include IMF PortWatch (accessed October 2024) and official Chittagong Port Authority statistics. Trading involves risk. Predictions may differ from actual outcomes.

Ballast Markets logo© 2025 Ballast Markets
TermsDisclosuresStatus